[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/1367832.1367844acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploratory text mining of ocean law to measure overlapping agency and jurisdictional authority

Published: 18 May 2008 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we describe an innovative application of mining laws to identify and measure overlapping jurisdictions of government agencies. Laws (statutes and regulations) were used to represent ocean and coastal management for four geopolitical jurisdictions of federal and state levels (Washington, Oregon, and California). We developed preliminary metrics of overlap based on the number of statutes, regulations, and agencies associated with any given topic. The utility of these metrics was tested on 46 topics representing a range of activities and resources across ocean-related sectors within the geographic scope of laws investigated. We found the preliminary results of the overlaps metrics to reveal results similar to a recent review of federal ocean management. In addition, a network diagram graphical display of the data revealed multiple dimensions to facilitate interpretation of results.

References

[1]
Baron, J. R. and Thompson, P. The Search Problem: Posed by Large Heterogeneous Data Sets in Litigation: Possible Future Approaches to Research. Stanford, CA, 2007.
[2]
Borgatti, S. P. NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Analytic Technologies, Natick, MA, 2002.
[3]
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C. Unicet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Inc., Natick, MA, 2002.
[4]
Cortner, H. J., Wallace, M. G., Burke, S. and Moote, M. M. Institutions matter: the need to address the institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40, 1--3 (1998), 159--166.
[5]
Crowder, L., Osherenko, G., Young, O., Airame, S., Norse, E. A., Baron, N., Day, J. C., Douvere, F., Ehler, C. N., Halpern, B. S., Langdon, S. J., McLeod, K. L., Ogden, J. C., Peach, R. E., Rosenberg, A. A. and Wilson, J. A. Resolving Mismatches in U.S. Ocean Governance. Science, 313, 5787 (2006), 617--618.
[6]
Ekstrom, J. A. Evaluating Current Ocean Management Systems to Facilitate the Development of Ecosystem-Based Management. Book of Abstracts of the California and World Ocean Conference, Long Beach, CA. 2006.
[7]
International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law http://www.iaail.org.
[8]
Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2004.
[9]
Lau, G. T., Law, K. and Wiederhold, G. A Relatedness Analysis of Government Regulations using Domain Knowledge and Structural Organization. Information Retrieval, 9, 6 2006), 657--680.
[10]
Lluch-Belda, D., Luch-Cota, D. B. and Luch-Cota, S. E. Interannual Variability Impacts on the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem: Trends in Exploration, Protection, and Research. Elsevier, Boston, 2003.
[11]
McArdle, D. A. California marine protected areas. California Sea Grant, University of California, La Jolla, 1997.
[12]
McLeod, K. L., Lubchenco, J., Palumbi, S. R. and Rosenberg, A. A. Scientific Consensus Statement on Marine Ecosystem-Based Management, 2005.
[13]
Salmon, G., Wong, A. and Yang, C. S. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Comm. ACM, 18, 11 (1975), 613--620.
[14]
Sherman, K. The Large Marine Ecosystem Concept: Research and Management Strategy for Living Marine Resources. Ecological Applications, 1, 4 (1991), 349--360.
[15]
Sherman, K. The Large Marine Ecosystem Approach for Assessment and Management of Ocean Coastal Waters. Elsevier, Boston, 2005.
[16]
U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy (USCOP). An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century Final Report of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. Final Report. Washington, D.C. (http://www.oceancommission.gov). 2004.
[17]
Wang, H. Ecosystem Management and Its Application to Large Marine Ecosystems: Science, Law, and Politics. Ocean Development and International Law, 35(2004), 41--74.
[18]
Young, O. R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Examples of specialized legal metadata adapted to the digital environment, from the U.S. code of federal regulationsProceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times10.1145/2037556.2037594(229-234)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2011
  • (2011)Application of the MINOE regulatory analysis frameworkProceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times10.1145/2037556.2037564(45-53)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2011
  • (2011)Adapting specialized legal metadata to the digital environmentProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/2018358.2018377(126-130)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2011

Index Terms

  1. Exploratory text mining of ocean law to measure overlapping agency and jurisdictional authority
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          dg.o '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research
          May 2008
          488 pages
          ISBN:9781605580999

          Sponsors

          • Routledge
          • Springer
          • Elsevier
          • Cefrio
          • NCDG: National Center for Digital Government

          Publisher

          Digital Government Society of North America

          Publication History

          Published: 18 May 2008

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. legal jurisdiction
          2. ocean management
          3. overlap
          4. text mining

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Conference

          dg.o '08
          Sponsor:
          • NCDG
          dg.o '08: Digital government research
          May 18 - 21, 2008
          Montreal, Canada

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2011)Examples of specialized legal metadata adapted to the digital environment, from the U.S. code of federal regulationsProceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times10.1145/2037556.2037594(229-234)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2011
          • (2011)Application of the MINOE regulatory analysis frameworkProceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times10.1145/2037556.2037564(45-53)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2011
          • (2011)Adapting specialized legal metadata to the digital environmentProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/2018358.2018377(126-130)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2011

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media