[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/1030453.1030708acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

CEPM 3: lead time reduction via pre-positioning of inventory in an industrial construction supply chain

Published: 08 December 2002 Publication History

Abstract

Lead time reduction is a key concern of many industrial buyers of capital facilities given current economic conditions. Supply chain initiatives in manufacturing settings have led owners to expect that dramatic reductions in lead time are possible in all phases of their business, including the delivery of capital materials. Further, narrowing product delivery windows and increasing pressure to be first-to-market create significant external pressure to reduce lead time. In this paper, a case study is presented in which an owner entered the construction supply chain to procure and position key long-lead materials. The materials were held at a position in the supply chain selected to allow some flexibility for continued customization, but dramatic reduction in the time-to-site. Simulation was used as a tool to consider time-to-site tradeoffs for multiple inventory locations so as to better match the needs of the construction effort.

References

[1]
AbouRizk, S. M. and D. Hajjar 1998. A Framework for Applying Simulation in the Construction Industry. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, CSCE, 25 (3): 604--617.
[2]
AbouRizk, S. M., J. Y. Ruwanpura, K. C. Er., and S. Fernando 1999. "Special Purpose Simulation Template for Utility Tunnel Construction." Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. P. A. Farrington, H. B. Nembhard, D. T. Sturrock, and G. W. Evans, 948--955, Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
[3]
Angerhofer, B. J., and M. C. Angelides 2000. System Dynamics Modelling in Supply Chain Management: Research Review. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, 342--351. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
[4]
Archibald, G., N. Karabakal, and P. Karlsson 1999. Supply Chain vs. Supply Chain: Using Simulation to Compete Beyond the Four Walls. Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, 1207--1214. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
[5]
Bhaskaran, S. 1998. Simulation Analysis of a Manufacturing Supply Chain. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 633--657.
[6]
Damelio, R. 1996. The Basics of Process Mapping. New York, NY: Productivity Press.
[7]
Forrester, J. W. 1958. Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decisions Makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 37--66.
[8]
Forrester, J. W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
[9]
Hajjar, D. and S. M. AbouRizk 1999. Simphony: An Environment for Building Special Purpose Construction Simulation Tools." Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. P. A. Farrington, H. B. Nembhard, D. T. Sturrock, and G. W. Evans, 998--1006, Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
[10]
Howell, G. and G. Ballard. 1996. Managing Uncertainty in the Piping Process. Construction Industry Institute Research Report 47--13. 103 pp. Austin, Texas: Construction Industry Institute.
[11]
Tommelein, I. D. 1998. Pull-Driven Scheduling for Pipe-Spool Installation: Simulation of a Lean Construction Technique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4), 279--288.
[12]
Tommelein, I. D., Riley, D., and G. A. Howell 1999. Parade Game: Impact of Work Flow Variability on Trade Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 125 (5): 304--310.
[13]
Trone, J., A. Guerin, and A. D. Clay 2000. Simulation of Waste Processing, Transportation, and Disposal Operations. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, 1085--1089. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
[14]
Vrijhoef, R., and L. Koskela 1999. Roles of supply Chain Management in Construction. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction IGLC-7, Available online via <http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/IGLC-7/PDF/Vrijhoef&Koskela.pdf>> {accessed July 1, 2002}.

Cited By

View all
  • (2003)Construction engineering and project management IIProceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation10.5555/1030818.1031027(1541-1547)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2003
  1. CEPM 3: lead time reduction via pre-positioning of inventory in an industrial construction supply chain

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSC '02: Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers
    December 2002
    2143 pages
    ISBN:0780376153
    • General Chair:
    • Jane L. Snowdon,
    • Program Chair:
    • John M. Charnes

    Sponsors

    • INFORMS/CS: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
    • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
    • ASA: American Statistical Association
    • ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
    • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
    • IEEE/CS: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
    • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
    • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
    • IEEE/SMCS: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society

    Publisher

    Winter Simulation Conference

    Publication History

    Published: 08 December 2002

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    WSC02
    Sponsor:
    • INFORMS/CS
    • IIE
    • ASA
    • ACM
    • SIGSIM
    • IEEE/CS
    • NIST
    • (SCS)
    • IEEE/SMCS
    WSC02: Winter Simulation Conference 2002
    December 8 - 11, 2002
    California, San Diego

    Acceptance Rates

    WSC '02 Paper Acceptance Rate 166 of 185 submissions, 90%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2003)Construction engineering and project management IIProceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation10.5555/1030818.1031027(1541-1547)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2003

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media