Investigating pre-service elementary teachers' epistemologies when talking about science, enacting science and reflecting on their enactment
Pages 33 - 40
Abstract
We described and compared 94 pre-service elementary teachers' epistemologies during three different activities: one semi-structured interview, an asynchronous on-line discussion about a physics problem and their reflection on the discussion of the second activity. Using discourse-based analysis, we analyzed the data in terms of the teachers' underlying epistemologies and findings revealed significant differences across the three activities. This suggests that (a) teachers' epistemologies might be better understood as finer grained cognitive resources whose activation is sensitive to the context, unlike most research which views them as coherent and stable cognitive structures, and that (b) the research community is far from settling the debate as to what particular approaches should be used to assess or study personal epistemologies. Depending on the context and the manner of investigation, students and teachers may "show" different epistemological understanding.
References
[1]
Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Boujaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673--699.
[2]
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. Int. J. of Science Education, 22(7), 665--701.
[3]
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417--436.
[4]
Abell, S, Martini, M. & George, M. (2001). That's what scientists have to do: preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1095--1109
[5]
Abell, S. K. & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science?: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475--487.
[6]
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990) Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
[7]
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
[8]
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321--346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[9]
Brickhouse, N. W. & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 471--485.
[10]
Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(1), 1--8.
[11]
diSessa, A. A., Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2002). J's epistemological stance and strategies. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 237--290). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[12]
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87(6), 477--531.
[13]
Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151--183.
[14]
Hammer, D. M., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169--190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[15]
Hodson, D. (1993) Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24, 41--52.
[16]
Hofer, B. K. (2002a). Epistemological world views of teachers: From beliefs to practice. Issues in Education, 8(2), 167--173.
[17]
Hofer, B. K. (2002b). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3--14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[18]
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Ed. Research, 67, 88--140.
[19]
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551--578.
[20]
King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[21]
King, P., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39, 5--18.
[22]
Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Sere, M.-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science: The consistency of representations across contexts. Learning & Instruction, 10, 497--527.
[23]
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331--360.
[24]
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916--929.
[25]
Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1993). How do students make sense of science? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 47--73.
[26]
Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson Nancy C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77--97.
[27]
Louca, T. L., Elby, A., Hammer, D. & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist 39(1), 57--68.
[28]
McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41--52). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
[29]
Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King's College.
[30]
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
[31]
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade.
[32]
Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. J. of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 595--615.
[33]
Penso, S., Shoman, E., & Shiloah, N. (2001). First Steps in Novice Teachers' Activity. Teacher Development, 5(3), 323--338.
[34]
Piaget, J., & Foundation, N. F. (1967). Further aspects of Piaget's work. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
[35]
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102 ± 119), New York: Macmillan.
[36]
Roth, W. M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 5--30.
[37]
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
[38]
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369--392.
[39]
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39, 19--29.
[40]
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., & Scott, L. (1994). Pupils' images of scientific epistemology. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 361--373.
[41]
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science and Education, 6(4), 355--371.
[42]
Tobin, K., Tippin, D. J. & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: National Science Teachers Association.
[43]
Van Driel, J., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137--158.
Recommendations
Technology workshops by in-service teachers for pre-service teachers
SIGUCCS '01: Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User servicesThis project was an initiative through university courses to have graduate in-service teachers, who have learned the use of technology for classroom instruction, offer workshops to undergraduate pre-service teachers. The goals of the project were two-...
Voices of Elementary Computer Science Teachers: Computer Science Integration Rationales and Practices
Objectives. Computer Science (CS) education has become increasingly prevalent in elementary schools because of multiple rationales, such as the importance of computational literacy and the growing demand for CS-related workforce preparation. As elementary ...
Disciplinary-Pedagogical Teacher Preparation for Pre-service Computer Science Teachers: Rational and Implementation
ISSEP '08: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives: Informatics Education - Supporting Computational ThinkingThis paper presents a case study of an academic course for pre-service computer science teachers that focus on teaching the discipline. The paper specifies and explains the rationale behind the development of the course and its explicit objectives. ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2010
1190 pages
- Conference Chairs:
- Susan Goldman,
- James Pellegrino,
- Editors:
- Kimberly Gomez,
- Leilah Lyons,
- Joshua Radinsky
Publisher
International Society of the Learning Sciences
Publication History
Published: 29 June 2010
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 74Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in