[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2660190.2660192acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfosdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Separating features using colored snippet graphs

Published: 14 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In feature-oriented software product lines, two complementary approaches to implement features exist: compositional and annotative ones. To combine the respective advantages, a unified representation of the two on the file-system level is desirable, yet unavailable. We pick up this demand and propose a novel concept for separating features using colored snippet graphs instead of directories and files. In particular, our proposed ideas are based on snippets, ASTs and coloring, and enable the implementation of product lines with both compositional and annotative views on real documents. As a basis for future tools, we provide a conceptual overview of our approach, discuss our ideas for leveraging snippets, and demonstrate applicability using an example scenario.

References

[1]
S. Apel, D. Batory, C. Kästner, and G. Saake. Feature-Oriented Software Product Lines. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
[2]
S. Apel, C. Kästner, and C. Lengauer. Language-Independent and Automated Software Composition: The FeatureHouse Experience. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., pages 63--79, 2013.
[3]
D. L. Atkins, T. Ball, T. L. Graves, and A. Mockus. Using version control data to evaluate the impact of software tools: a case study of the Version Editor. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., pages 625--637, 2002.
[4]
D. Batory, P. Höfner, B. Möller, and A. Zelend. Features, modularity, and variation points. In FOSD, pages 9--16, 2013.
[5]
D. Batory, J. Sarvela, and A. Rauschmayer. Scaling step-wise refinement. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., pages 355--371, 2004.
[6]
C. Brabrand, M. Ribeiro, T. Tolêdo, and P. Borba. Intraprocedural dataflow analysis for software product lines. In AOSD, pages 13--24, 2012.
[7]
A. Classen, M. Cordy, P. Y. Schobbens, P. Heymans, A. Legay, and J. F. Raskin. Featured Transition Systems: Foundations for Verifying Variability-Intensive Systems and Their Application to LTL Model Checking. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., pages 1069--1089, 2013.
[8]
K. Czarnecki and M. Antkiewicz. Mapping features to models: a template approach based on superimposed variants. In GPCE, pages 422--437, 2005.
[9]
M. Erwig, E. Walkingshaw, and S. Chen. An abstract representation of variational graphs. In FOSD, pages 25--32, 2013.
[10]
J. Harder and N. Göde. Cloned code: stable code. J. Softw. Evol. and Proc., pages 1063--1088, 2013.
[11]
A. Heuer, V. Stricker, C. J. Budnik, S. Konrad, K. Lauenroth, and K. Pohl. Defining variability in activity diagrams and Petri nets. Science of Comp. Prog., pages 2414--2432, 2013.
[12]
W. Hofer, C. Elsner, F. Blendinger, W. Schröder-Preikschat, and D. Lohmann. Toolchain-independent variant management with the Leviathan filesystem. In FOSD, pages 18--24, 2010.
[13]
D. Janzen and K. De Volder. Programming with Crosscutting Effective Views. In ECOOP, LNCS, pages 197--220. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
[14]
C. Kästner and S. Apel. Integrating compositional and annotative approaches for product line engineering. In McGPLE, pages 35--40, 2008.
[15]
C. Kästner, S. Apel, and M. Kuhlemann. Granularity in Software Product Lines. In ICSE, pages 311--320, 2008.
[16]
C. Kästner, S. Apel, and M. Kuhlemann. A model of refactoring physically and virtually separated features. In GPCE, pages 157--166, 2009.
[17]
C. Kästner, S. Apel, and K. Ostermann. The road to feature modularity? In SPLC, pages 5:1--5:8, 2011.
[18]
C. Kästner, S. Apel, S. Trujillo, M. Kuhlemann, and D. Batory. Guaranteeing syntactic correctness for all product line variants: A language-independent approach. In TOOLS EUROPE, pages 175--194, 2009.
[19]
L. Kirsch, J. Botev, and S. Rothkugel. Snippets and Component-Based Authoring Tools for Reusing and Connecting Documents. JDIM, pages 399--409, 2012.
[20]
L. Kirsch, J. Botev, and S. Rothkugel. The Snippet Platform Architecture: Dynamic and Interactive Compound Documents. ICIMT, pages 161--167, 2013.
[21]
C. Prehofer. Feature-oriented programming: A fresh look at objects. In ECOOP, pages 419--443, 1997.
[22]
M. Ribeiro, P. Borba, and C. Kastner. Feature Maintenance with Emergent Interfaces. In ICSE, pages 989--1000, 2014.
[23]
S. Schulze. Analysis and Removal of Code Clones in Software Product Lines. PhD thesis, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, 2013.
[24]
N. Singh, C. Gibbs, and Y. Coady. C-CLR: a tool for navigating highly configurable system software. In ACP4IS, 2007.
[25]
H. Spencer and G. Collyer. #ifdef Considered Harmful or Portability Experience with C News. In USENIX Conf., 1992.
[26]
T. Thüm, S. Apel, C. Kästner, I. Schaefer, and G. Saake. A classification and survey of analysis strategies for software product lines. ACM Comput. Surv., pages 6:1--6:45, 2014.
[27]
E. Walkingshaw and M. Erwig. A calculus for modeling and implementing variation. In GPCE, pages 132--140, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Towards a uniform code annotation approach with configurable annotation granularity2017 IEEE 14th International Scientific Conference on Informatics10.1109/INFORMATICS.2017.8327238(152-157)Online publication date: Nov-2017
  • (2014)Integrating approaches for feature implementationProceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/2635868.2666605(775-778)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2014

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
FOSD '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development
September 2014
53 pages
ISBN:9781450329804
DOI:10.1145/2660190
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 September 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. features
  2. granularity
  3. modularity
  4. snippets
  5. software product lines
  6. virtual separation of concerns

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

FOSD '14

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 28 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Towards a uniform code annotation approach with configurable annotation granularity2017 IEEE 14th International Scientific Conference on Informatics10.1109/INFORMATICS.2017.8327238(152-157)Online publication date: Nov-2017
  • (2014)Integrating approaches for feature implementationProceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/2635868.2666605(775-778)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2014

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media